Nail holes: almost always wear and tear
A reasonable number of small nail holes from hanging pictures is normal wear and tear in essentially every jurisdiction - hanging art is ordinary use of a home. The chargeable line is volume and size: dozens of holes, large anchors, or wall damage from removal.
Why picture holes are ordinary use
Courts treat a home as a place to live, and living includes hanging pictures, mirrors, and shelves in reasonable numbers. The small holes that leaves are the definition of wear and tear: predictable, minor, and produced by intended use.
Where holes cross into damage
Quantity and size move the line. Dozens of holes in one wall, large drywall anchors, lag bolts from TV mounts left unpatched, or chunks pulled out during removal go beyond ordinary hanging - those can be charged, at the actual cost of patching.
What patching actually costs
A nail hole takes spackle, a putty knife, and minutes. Even a handyman billing a full hour covers a room’s worth of holes. When an itemization prices nail holes at hundreds of dollars, it is usually a repaint relabeled as damage repair - and repainting after normal wear is the landlord’s own turnover cost.
Should you patch before moving out?
Small holes: usually yes - a clean spackle pass removes the argument entirely. But a bad patch job (wrong texture, unpainted spots, smeared filler) can cost more than the holes, because fixing poor repairs is chargeable. If you are not confident, leave small holes alone and let the wear-and-tear rule do its work; do patch large anchor holes properly or have them done.
Your state's rules on this
The wear-and-tear line is national; the deadline, penalties, and court are your state's. Pick it:
Disputing a charge like this
The path is the same everywhere: demand the itemized statement and receipts your state requires, dispute the charge in writing by certified mail, and let the statute's penalties do the arguing. Most disputes settle at the letter. Free demand letter for your state →
Frequently asked questions
How many nail holes count as normal wear and tear?
No statute sets a number - the standard is reasonableness. A few holes per wall from pictures and shelves is ordinary use; a wall perforated by dozens, or holes from heavy anchors, starts looking like damage. Judges apply common sense, and the landlord still bears the burden of justifying the charge.
What about TV mount holes?
Lag-bolt holes from a TV mount are bigger than picture-hanging wear, and unpatched they are commonly treated as chargeable. Patching them properly before move-out - or having a handyman do it for a modest fee - is almost always cheaper than the deduction.
My landlord charged $200 for nail holes. Is that legal?
It is disputable almost anywhere. Spackling small holes is minutes of labor; a $200 line item usually smuggles in a full repaint, which after normal wear is the landlord’s turnover cost. Demand the breakdown - holes patched, time billed, rate - and dispute the repaint portion as wear and tear.
Command strips pulled paint off the wall. Wear or damage?
Small patches of lifted paint from adhesive hooks sit close to the line but are commonly argued as wear - adhesive hooks are marketed for exactly this use. Large peeled areas are harder to defend. Either way the depreciation rule applies: old paint has little value left to charge against.
Let the analyzer argue each charge for you
The case builder reviews every deduction on your itemized statement against your state's wear-and-tear and receipt rules, flags the overreach, and writes the demand letter with the exact statute citations.
Build your case →